Colloque : Rapports ambivalents entre les sciences sociales européennes et américaines

2.02- The ambiguous relationship between ethnomethodology and mainstream sociology in North and South America

Auteur(s) : Aaron V. Cicourel

Autres langues :

Documents :

Version pdf- [86.48 KB - Anglais]

The area of inquiry known as 'ethnomethodology' should not be confused with a method often linked to it and called 'conversation analysis' or CA. The first has it roots in European philosophy, especially phenomenology, as in the work of Edmund Husserl, Aflred Schütz, and Aron Gurwitsch. Harold Garfinkel relied heaving on these three authors (and others, for example Felix Kaufmann, Karl Mannheim, Maurice Merleau-Ponty). In coining the term 'ethnomethodology,' he applied and sometimes extended key concepts developed by Husserl, Schütz, Gurwitsch and Mannheim. The method known as 'CA' has its roots in work by John Austin, Dwight Bollinger, Noam Chomsky, Frieda Goldman-Eisler, and H. Paul Grice, among others, and was developed within sociology by Harvey Sacks. Whereas ethnomethodology has had a somewhat mixed reception yet recognized as a contribution to sociology, CA as a method is seldom referenced or used by mainstream sociologists, but enjoys recognition and use by some linguists, applied linguists, linguistic anthropologists, sociolinguists, a few psycholinguists, and some researchers working in departments of communication. When viewed as social movements, ethnomethodology and CA provide us with insights about how academic disciplines in the social sciences resist and accept new theoretical and methodological developments. The paper first provides a brief discussion of initial North American resistance, then grudging, partial acceptance of ethnomethodology. CA, in my view, remains marginal to mainstream sociology but has been integrated into systematic studies of casual and institutional discourse. The South American situation is less clear, but some evidence is available.

Haut de la page  ]

Rencontres

Réseau « ESSE »

9-10 Janvier 2009 - L’espace intellectuel en Europe 19e – 21e siècles
Resp. G. Sapiro, F. Schultheis, V. Dubois

Publications et activités

Les contradictions de la globalisation éditoriale

[5.1.2009] - Publications

Vient de paraitre sous la direction de Gisèle Sapiro Les contradictions de la globalisation éditoriale aux éditions du Nouveau Monde [...]

Le nouveau site TRANSEO est en ligne !

[24.12.2008] - Publications

TRANSEO est une revue transdisciplinaire et transnationale sur la production et les usages des biens culturels, littéraires et scientifiques [...]

archive des nouvelles >>